I found out that Poisson distribution “expresses the probability of a number of events occurring in a fixed period of time if these events occur with a known average rate and independently of the time since the last event.” (wiki) I think it may be related to QM.

Anyways, the only parameter λ in the poisson equation is “expected number of occurrences” in a given interval; that is, if λ is set to be 1, the event is expected to happen only one time in a given interval (time/distance/whatever). Because λ is always positive, the poisson equation is always larger than 0, and thus the negative part can be thrown out…(maybe?)

From the wiki, the plot shows that, in the case of λ=1, the probability of the event to occur exactly (shown by the x-axis) is about 0.7 (which is about the same as the plot I got from fitting). [But I don’t fully understand why…] As λ increases, the plot spreads out. (Why? – I am still thinking …)

Anyways, I just share what I know and what I don’t know… If I said something wrong/you know something that I miss, let me know!

Thanks,

Elim =D

## 4 thoughts on “About Poisson Distribution…”

1. chelsea says:

So is k, the frequency of events, not a parameter? That seems strange to me. And I don’t see why that is a reason for the negative part to be thrown out…

2. Elim says:

I don’t think k is a parameter. Maybe I am wrong..
From what I understand just now, k is the actual number of occurrences while the input parameter, λ, is the expected number of occurrences.
The following is my own thinking:
So, we have several bins in front of us and we are going to throw some balls into those bins. For each bin, we expect a certain amount of balls; that is λ. When we actually throw the balls randomly, we have the actual results; that is k. And then, we will see if which λ gives the best results (that’s the fitting).
Maybe this thinking doesn’t make sense to anyone..and maybe I am completely wrong…I am not quit sure…please let me your thoughts.

Because k is #_events, which is always positive, there is no -ve events. So, the -ve x-axis is always zero. What i meant “thrown out” is not really thrown out, but zero.. sorry if i confused you..And, it make sense from the graph too.

Again, I maybe completely wrong..that’s just my thoughts…
Elim =D

3. arno says:

To understand the Poisson distribution perhaps it is helpful to try to understand the difference/relation to the Gaussian distribution.

Also from Wikipedia: […] In probability theory and statistics, the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution is a continuous probability distribution that describes data that cluster around the mean. The graph of the associated probability density function is bell-shaped, with a peak at the mean, and is known as the Gaussian function or bell curve. […] By the central limit theorem, the sum of a large number of independent random variables is distributed approximately normally. […] Another practical consequence of the central limit theorem is that certain other distributions can be approximated by the normal distribution, for example:

-The binomial distribution B(n, p) is approximately normal N(np, np(1 − p)) for large n and for p not too close to zero or one.
-The Poisson(λ) distribution is approximately normal N(λ, λ) for large values of λ.
-The chi-squared distribution χ2(k) is approximately normal N(k, 2k) for large ks.
-The Student’s t-distribution t(ν) is approximately normal N(0, 1) when ν is large.

Whether these approximations are sufficiently accurate depends on the purpose for which they are needed, and the rate of convergence to the normal distribution. It is typically the case that such approximations are less accurate in the tails of the distribution.

[…]

1. arno says: