An alternative viewpoint

We got a long way with this equation, which came from one of the constant acceleration equations in the y-direction.

½m vy2 = ½m voy2 + may Δy

We can do the same thing in the x-direction, to get:

½m vx2 = ½m vox2 + max Δx

Are we adding vectors or scalars here?

Another thing we can do is to add the equations. This gives:

½m vx2 + ½m vy2 = ½m vox2 + ½m voy2 + max Δx + may Δy

Let's simplify this a bit:

½m v2 = ½m vo2 + max Δx + may Δy

Now, max is the x-component of the net force, and may is the y-component of the net force, so:

½m v2 = ½m vo2 + FNETx Δx + FNETy Δy

Is there some way to simplify this? We also need to keep in mind when a term like FNETx Δx is positive and when it is negative.

The equation can actually be written as:

½m v2 = ½m vo2 + FNETΔr

What should we call this new quantity FNETΔr? It is some kind of energy.

Let's call it the work done by the net force.