H. Eugene Stanley

H. Eugene Stanley

Professor (William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor) until 2020
Emeritus (Professor Emeritus )
Office: SCI, Room 204B. 617-353-2617


Research Interests:

Puzzles of Interdisciplinary Science

I work in collaboration with students and colleagues in an attempt to understand the puzzles of interdisciplinary science. Currently my main focus is understanding the anomalous behavior of liquid water in bulk, nanoconfined, and biological environments. I have also worked on a range of other topics in complex systems, such as quantifying correlations among the constituents of the Alzheimer brain, quantifying fluctuations in noncoding and coding DNA sequences, and interbeat intervals of the healthy and diseased heart.

Selected Publications:

“Catastrophic Cascade of Failures in Interdependent Networks,” S. V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H. E. Stanley, and S. Havlin, Nature 464, 1025-1028 (2010). Accompanied by “News & Views” article “The Fragility of Interdependency,” by A. Vespignani on pp. 984-985. Featured in the newsstory “When Networks Net-work,” by Elizabeth Quill, Science News 182[6], 18 (22 Sepember 2012), available at http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/343939.

“The Relationship between Liquid, Supercooled and Glassy Water,” O. Mishima and H. E. Stanley, Nature 396, 329–335 (1998).

“Scaling Behaviour in the Dynamics of an Eco-nomic Index,” R. N. Mantegna and H. E. Stanley, Nature 376, 46–49 (1995).

“Phase Behavior of Metastable Water,” P. H. Poole, F. Sciortino, U. Essmann, and H. E. Stanley, Nature 360, 324-328 (1992).

“Long-Range Correlations in Nucleotide Sequences,” C. K. Peng, S. Buldyrev, A. Goldberger, S. Havlin, F. Sciortino, M. Simons, and H. E. Stanley, Nature 356, 168–171 (1992).

For a full list of publications, please see the attached CV


  • B.A. in physics, Wesleyan University
  • Ph.D. in physics, Harvard University


  • Member, National Academy of Sciences
  • Foreign Member, Academia Brasileira de Ciencias (Brazilia n Academy of Sciences)
  • Honorary Member, Hungarian Physical Society
  • John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellowship
  • Senior Award, European Complex Systems Society, 2014
  • Julius Edgar Lilienfeld Prize, Am. Phys. Soc., 2008
  • Boltzmann Medal, International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), 2004
  • Teresiana Medal in Complex Systems Research, Institute for Advanced Studies, Univ. Pavia, 2004
  • Nicholson Medal, American Physical Society, 2003
  • Distinguished Teacher–Scholar Prize, 2001. Awarded by the Director of the National Science Foundation.
  • David Turnbull Prize, Materials Research Society, 1998.
  • Floyd K. Richtmyer Prize, AAPT, 1997
  • Zenith Fellow Award of the Alzheimer Association(shared with D. B. Teplow), 2005
  • Memory Ride Prize for Alzheimer research(shared with B. T. Hyman), 2001
  • Choice Award for Outstanding Academic Book of 1971
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science
  • Fellow of the American Physical Society

In the news:

Research Descriptions:

Application of Statistical Physics to Understanding and Preventing Diseases Related to Protein Misfolding, such as Alzheimer Disease


For more than a decade, we have been using our expertise in statistical and condensed matter physics to study the early stages of aggregation of the amyloid beta-protein that eventually makes up the toxic fibrils and plaques found in the brains of Alzheimer patients. We are refining protein-folding models designed to identify the areas of the amyloid protein that are involved in the misfolding process, and to predict forms that the proteins are likely to take in the human brain. The protein structures that the our computer models predict are compared to actual proteins synthesized in the lab by neurological biochemist Dr. David Teplow at UCLA; this dialogue between computational models and observed results ensures that the computer models are accurately mimicking amyloid protein misfolding as it occurs in the brain of an Alzheimer patient.

Econophysics: Using Statistical Physics Concepts to Better Understand Economic Questions

A physicist views the economy as a collection of interacting units. This collection is complex; everything depends on everything else. The interesting problem is: how does everything depend on everything else? Physicists are looking for laws that will help us understand this complex interaction.

To a physicist, the most interesting thing about economics is that it is dominated by fluctuations in quantities of economic interest. Because big economic shocks affect the economy around the world, the possibility of an economic “meltdown” is one that we must take seriously. Big changes in big money affect not only people with large amounts of it, but also those who have very little of it—those on the margins of society.

Finding ideas that serve to solve economic problems can potentially help in making progress on unsolved physics problems. A good example is turbulence. If we take a bucket of water and disturb the surface, energy is added to the system on a big scale. This energy then dissipates over progressively smaller scales. This is an unsolved physics problem; many empirical facts can be stated, but little can be said about understanding it. The economy is analogous to this example of turbulence. One can add information on a big scale to an economic system—e.g., the news of who wins a presidential election—and that information is dissipated on smaller and smaller scales. The way that you handle the “turbulence” associated with this dissipation of information in a financial market may help us understand how to approach turbulence in our physics research.

Physical Mechanisms in Liquid Water


Water is a unique substance. It plays a major role in all living systems, and even small perturbations such as the substitution of deuterium for hydrogen are sufficient to destroy biological function. In living systems, essential water-related phenomena occur in restricted geometries in cells and organelles, and at active sites on membranes. The liquid-liquid phase transition hypothesis arose from molecular dynamics studies on the structure and equation of state of supercooled bulk water and has received some support. Below the hypothesized second critical point, the liquid phase separates into two distinct liquid phases: a low-density liquid (LDL) phase at low pressures and a high-density liquid (HDL) at high pressure. Bulk water near the known critical point at 647 K is a fluctuating mixture of molecules whose local structures resemble the liquid and gas phases. Similarly, bulk water near the hypothesized liquid-liquid critical point is a fluctuating mixture of molecules whose local structures resemble the two phases, LDL and HDL. These enhanced fluctuations influence the properties of liquid bulk water, thereby leading to anomalous behavior. Consistent with this hypothesis are recent MIT experiments, which our group is interpreting. We are also extending our work to the special layer of water surrounding a protein (“hydration water”), which appears to have a dynamic crossover not unlike that observed for water confined in 1D nanopores.

Threat Networks and Threatened Networks: Stabilization and Immunization of Networks

Our scientific goal is to uncover common principles governing the behavior of a range of social networks. Our practical goal is to use this understanding to develop specific strategies to destroy threat networks, and in parallel to develop specific strategies to defend threatened social networks against attack. There is evidence that progress toward achieving both goals can be achieved using new approaches from modern statistical physics to social network structure and dynamics that our group has contributed to.